COPIED
4 mins

More than 100 acres of new green surfaces in Ljubljana

Degraded, overlooked and unused areas of the city of Ljubljana are being converted into new green surfaces. This contributes to mitigating climate change and enhances the quality of life of citizens and visitors alike.

Green infrastructure (GI) should not be understood as something new. The concept of GI, which includes the concept that nature is essential for improving people’s quality of life and well-being in cities, can be traced back to the first half of the 19th century. From that time, different planning approaches, embedded in societal needs, started to emerge, such as green belts, public parks, garden cities, regional green systems and greenways. It is important to build on experiences gained and adapt them to meet new needs and circumstances.

In the early 1990s, ‘green system planning’ started in Slovenia, and it has been part of municipal spatial planning since then. The Ljubljana green system, for example, has been developed to provide an interconnected system of natural elements that stretch into the city and scattered green areas, managing the ecological, cultural and morphological role of green areas in the urban tissue.

The role of green systems in Slovenia

Green systems are contingent on spatial circumstances. They encompass different types of green areas such as parks, trees, playgrounds, urban forests, water and green spaces along waterways, urban gardening areas and formerly degraded areas turned into various types of green areas. This illustrates, in my opinion, that green system planning and GI planning have similar if not the same purposes and benefits.Nevertheless, the GI initiative gave new impetus to the argument that high-quality and well-functioning natural systems translate into high-quality and well-supported societal development. This is particularly important in cities, where there is more demand for social and cultural functions: green systems can reduce heat island effects, contribute to stormwater management and support soft mobility, all of which can make cities more attractive and liveable? I believe that the amelioration of urban green areas improves the attractiveness of cities and counteracts, to at least some degree, suburbanisation, which requires new land take and soil sealing.

"SEA is mainly used separately from planning, which means that it cannot effetively contribute to the improvement of planning"

Green infrastructure in spatial and urban planning

The EU strategy on green infrastructure highlights that GI should be ‘a strategically planned network’. It should be embedded in spatial planning and management. As such, it could give appropriate strategic orientation, which results from reconciling different needs, opportunities and restrictions, and taking into account multiple interests at different levels.

However, when adapting the GI concept to spatial and urban planning, we are confronted with many policy, methodological and technical questions. To name just a few of them: What does GI mean to compact cities? How do we cope with zero net land take in GI planning? Is GI a type of land use or not? As rightly highlighted by the GRETA (Green Infrastructure:Enhancing Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Territorial Development) project, ‘GI development requires space’, which may, at the same time, ‘increase land-use competition’.

There are two other aspects of the GI concept, namely multifunctionality and connectivity. Experts claim that GI provides multifunctionality per se because ecosystems in principle provide multiple benefits through ecosystem services.

But, in practice, multifunctionality should be achieved in a concrete spatial and urban setting.

As described in the GRETA project, ecosystem services can provide support for multiple policies, especially when the former are in synergy. But ecosystem services can also contradict one another, affecting each other negatively. That is why a place-based or ‘functional’ approach, as it is called in the GRETA project, is crucial, because it is the only approach that addresses different opportunities and needs in different spatial contexts.

However, this also gives rise to concerns about the GRETA recommendation to use strategic environmental assessment (SEA) to include GI in spatial development plans. SEA is mainly used separately from planning, which means that it cannot effetively contribute to the improvement of planning. In the SEA process, requirements from environmental, health, water, nature and culture conservation policies are addressed separately; they are not interrelated and not adapted to the level of a spatial plan.

The case of Slovenia

In Slovenia, we are currently preparing a long-term spatial development strategy, which includes GI as an integrated element of spatial development together with polycentric urban development, wider urban areas and rural areas. One of the strategy’s objectives is to improve the quality of life in urban and rural areas. Green systems or GI at regional and local levels play an important role in this endeavour.

GI is connected to similar areas in a wider space to enable ecological connectivity among naturally preserved areas of the Alps and Dinaric Mountains, cross-border rivers and the sea. Thus, it also contributes to the implementation of the Alpine Green Infrastructure Declaration, ‘Joining forces for nature, people and economy’, adopted in 2018 within the framework of the EU strategy for the Alpine region (EUSALP).

In addition to supporting ecological functions, GI increases climate change resilience at the national level. At regional and local levels, GI can be implemented as regional green systems within regional spatial plans and green systems of settlements within local spatial planning documents. Providing appropriate connections among them will enable the development of genuine GI, supporting sustainable societal development.

The implementation of GI at the regional level is being tested as part of the Interreg project PERFECT – Planning for Environment and Resource Efficiency in European Cities and Towns (1), which aims to develop a regional GI strategy for the Ljubljana urban area. The strategy will provide a basis for a regional spatial plan and other plans and future investments in this field. One of the outputs expected from the PERFECT project is more awareness and an improved understanding of GI among local decision-makers, which will be crucial for implementing the GI concept in the future.

This article appears in Green infrastructure and reuse of spaces

Go to Page View
This article appears in...
Green infrastructure and reuse of spaces
Go to Page View
Dubravka Šuica: How can we support people and regions to adapt to changing realities?
Dubravka Šuica is Vice President of the European
Željko Uhlir: A strong Europe in a world of challenges
Željko Uhlir is State Secretary at the Ministry
Foreword
The current pandemic has added to the numerous
Claude Turmes: Using ESPON in Policymaking
Claude Turmes is Minister for Energy and Spatial
Regenerating cities: The critical role of buildings
" Reaching the goals of 2050 is not
Green Infrastructure in urban areas
What is green infrastructure? Green infrastructure (GI) has
Cross-border cooperation in midst of COVID 19 crisis
The current unprecedented crisis has put to the
Green Infrastructure in the Netherlands: a policy-maker's perspective
I was asked to reflect on the ESPON
More than 100 acres of new green surfaces in Ljubljana
Degraded, overlooked and unused areas of the city
Circular management for greener cities
Circular management of spaces and buildings and green
How green is the reuse of spaces and buildings?
In many cities, population growth puts pressure on
Sustainable regeneration of port cities
Despite overall growth in the maritime sector, many
Urbanisation and land-use practices in European regions
Improving urbanisation and land use practices in European
Improving knowledge about the reuse of spaces and buildings
The new ESPON Policy Brief Reuse of Spaces
Cork’s docklands – learning from regeneration in a port city
On 31 May 2019, Cork City expanded its
ESPON evidence in planning practice and policy development
It is commonly understood that the development of
A practical handbook for SDG 11 and 15
The Urban Agenda partnerships on the circular economy
A practical tool to implement nature-based solutions
We consider the topics of reuse of spaces
Territorial approach is crucial for sustainability goals
Daniel Baliński is deputy director of the Strategy
Urban green infrastructure and reuse of spaces and buildings: views from Croatia
Croatian towns and cities face similar challenges to
State of the European territory: A key contribution to the debate about the future EU
As a geographer and a Member of the
Healthy and active ageing is more important than ever
In the Decade of Healthy Ageing (2020–2030), the
Shrinking Rural Areas: A fresh look at an old problem
Rural depopulation is not a new phenomenon. EU
The Hague and the urban circular collaborative economy
Jan Harko Post Jay Navarro Oviedo Triggered by
Scope and use of digital plan data platforms in Europe
In the past decade, many European countries have
Changing ground: The future place of the productive city
Over the past decades, metropolitan areas across Europe
Localising SDG goals
In 2015, the UN General Assembly adopted the
A New ESPON tool for macroregions in Europe
The new European and Macro-regional Territorial Monitoring (EMTM)
Technological transformation: Growth opportunities for lagging regions in Europe
The 4.0 technological transformation rests on the creative
Success story: Quick Check Territorial Impact Assessment
Identifying whether or not EU policies, or policies
ESPON FUORE: A tool beyond the classical administrative boundaries
Development and sustainability policies are looking progressively into
Territorial Quality of Life: ESPON measurement
The ESPON Quality of Life Measurements and Methodology
ESPON TOURISM –a tool for the tourism of the future
Tourism is one of the largest economic sectors
Net impact of Interreg: statistical inference
As part of its transnational outreach efforts, ESPON
Entrepreneurial development niches for Interreg
This article introduces potential niches for Interreg programmes
interreg EUROPAN
European union European Regional Development Fund
URBACT
Driving change for better cities
INTERact
EU cities facing COVID-19: impact and responses URBACT,
Shaping the future of the ESPON programme
As the next programming period approaches, the exchanges
Geography of COVID19 and first policy answers in European regions
The sudden appearance and exponential increase in severe
Outlook for the German Presidency
The COVID-19 pandemic has shifted the priorities of
Looking for back issues?
Browse the Archive >

Previous Article Next Article