The eighth Cohesion Report: initial reflections on the future of Cohesion Policy

Nathalie Sarrabezolles, Chairwoman of the COTER commission of the CoR and Member of Finistère Departmental Council

The eighth Cohesion Report of the European Commission in February 2022 sets out the main developments and territorial disparities that European regions have experienced over the last decade. In addition to this very well-known feature of the regular cohesion reports, it also points towards the upcoming debate on the future of cohesion after 2027.

This debate is not technical. It is highly political because it touches on many of the challenges in Europe in troubled times. It’s about all facets of the resilience of cities and regions; overcoming the existing disparities in Europe, despite the enormous success of Cohesion Policy in the past; facing climate change and adaptation; the rural–urban divide; the role of middle-sized cities in Europe; digital hyperconnectivity; and, last but surely not least, addressing discontent in Europe.

These challenges cannot be addressed, and most certainly cannot be solved, by Cohesion Policy alone. However, Cohesion Policy has always been a good indicator of investment priorities and trends in the territories of the European Union. In this contribution and in my capacity as rapporteur of the European CoR on the eighth Cohesion Report, I outline some of my initial reflections on the report and some ideas for the future.

Comments on the eighth Cohesion Report
When looking at the report, we note that the slow resumption of the convergence process in recent years hides very different trends: several less developed regions and transition regions in southern and north-western Europe have shown low or negative growth; at the same time, regional growth in the East is sometimes still marked by strong differences between capital regions and other regions.

The existing disparities, as outlined by the report, fully reinforce the legitimacy of Cohesion Policy as defined in the Treaties. This is primarily about reducing the disparities in wealth and development between the regions of the European Union. I therefore welcome the analysis presented in the Cohesion Report on the impact of Cohesion Policy for the period 2014–2020 on investment across the territories of the European Union. We should not forget that Cohesion Policy has often played a key role in maintaining a sufficient level of public investment in the face of a decline in national investments. 

The existing disparities, as outlined by the report, fully reinforce the legitimacy of Cohesion Policy as defined in the Treaties

While Cohesion Policy has also proven to be an effective tool in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic crisis, notably through the flexibility measures introduced as of April 2020, I would insist that the main focus of Cohesion Policy should be maintained: strengthening territorial, economic and social cohesion in Europe.

The concept of ‘do not harm cohesion’
I noted and strongly welcomed the introduction of a new concept in the Cohesion Report. The concept is aimed at extending the holistic approach to Cohesion Policy to any European public policy with territorial impact. This concept not only fully reflects the initiative of the European Committee of the Regions to demonstrate the role of cohesion as a fundamental value of the European Union; it could (and should!) also enable any European policy to take account of the diversity of the regional realities in the European Union, increase their effectiveness and improve the visibility of EU action among citizens.

Cohesion Policy at the heart of a long-term European strategy
Although Cohesion Policy is expected to play a role in achieving overarching EU objectives, namely the European Green Deal and the European Pillar of Social Rights, it is not part of a European long-term strategy as such, unlike Cohesion Policy 2014–2020, which was directly linked to achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 strategy. This is unfortunate and I would therefore suggest drawing up a new long-term European strategy for 2030, linking the imperatives of the green and digital transitions, while also strengthening the EU’s economic, social and territorial cohesion.

I can only welcome the intention expressed in the Cohesion Report to strengthen multilevel governance and the partnership principle

Partnership with local and regional authorities
In all our discussions with members of the European Committee of the Regions, we have noted a certain centralisation of Cohesion Policy 2021–2027 and the undermining of both the partnership principle and the role of regional authorities in defining investment needs in the context of operational programmes. 
I can therefore only welcome the intention expressed in the Cohesion Report to strengthen multilevel governance and the partnership principle. We will make this a very important point in future discussions because it also touches on principles such as ownership, trust and involvement in European policy implementation. I would urgently call on the European Commission to enhance the role of the regions in the management of the European Structural and Investment Funds, and to strengthen the legislative provisions linked to the partnership, particularly regarding the post-2027 period.

As rapporteur of the CoR, I will engage our members representing all territories of the European Union to be vigilant in the discussions around the eighth Cohesion Report and the following debate on the future of Cohesion Policy. We need to ensure that Cohesion Policy remains not only a strong technical delivery tool for EU objectives in our cities and regions, but also a well-recognised idea and vision of the EU for strong cohesion among all.

This article appears in Stronger together

Go to Page View
This article appears in...
Stronger together
Go to Page View
Wiktor Szydarowski, Director, ESPON EGTC
European challenges at the heart of renewed territorial planning
Yves Le Breton, Director General National Agency for Territorial Cohesion, (ANCT) France
We're going to do it because it's hard, not because it's easy
Mariana Mazzucato, Professor in the Economics of Innovation and Public Value at University College London.
15-minute city // 30-minutes territory
Carlos Moreno, Professor and the scientific director of the ETI Chair - Paris Pantheon Sorbonne University. Interview to Marie-Lorraine Dangeard, ANCT
Holding the European social model when challenged by external pressures, internal effects and continuous crises
Christa Schweng, president of the European Economic and Social Committee
The evolution and future of Cohesion Policy
Peter Berkowitz, Director Policy Development and Economic Analysis, at the Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, European Commission
The eighth Cohesion Report: initial reflections on the future of Cohesion Policy
Nathalie Sarrabezolles, Chairwoman of the COTER commission of the CoR and Member of Finistère Departmental Council
Addressing policy challenges in urban and spatial planning through EU cohesion policy
Efthimios Bakogiannis, Secretary General of Spatial Planning and Urban Environment in the Ministry of Environment and Energy in Greece, and Assistant Professor, National Technical University of Athens
The right questions to ask about the future of cohesion policy
Francesco Molica, Director for Regional Policy, CPMR
The economic and social impact of COVID-19: a selection of policy responses
Nora Sanchez Gassen and John Moodie, Senior Research Fellows, Nordregio
Lagging regions: how to bounce forward
Annabelle Boutet, Head of the Foresight, Monitoring and Innovation Unit, French National Agency for Territorial Cohesion (ANCT)
Russia’s aggression against Ukraine: Europe’s next crucial steps
Urmas Paet, Vice-Chair of the European Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee
Rebuilding Ukraine after the war, with support from the EU
Oleksandr Slobozhan, PhD in public administration Executive Director of the All-Ukrainian Association of Local Governments Bodies (Association of Ukrainian Cities)
From destruction to a new dimension of sustainability in post-war Ukraine
Eugenia Maruniak, D.Sc., Leonid Rudenko, Academician, D.Sc., Prof., Sergiy Lisovskyi, D.Sc., Yuriy Palekha, D.Sc.
EIB is ready to support EU efforts to rebuild Ukraine
Jean-Erik De Zagon, the Head of the EIB representation in Ukraine. Interview to Nikos Lampropoulos, ESPON EGTC
Cross-border public services: a pathway for full territorial cohesion
Valeria Cenacchi and Ricardo Ferreira, European Commission, DG Regio, Border Focal point
Rising awareness of brownfield potential
Lorraine Mazur, Senior Consultant, Damiano Ravera, Junior Consultant, Ramboll Management Consulting
New geographies, new institutional frameworks
Lanfranco Senn, Università Bocconi, Globus et Locus and Luca Garavaglia, Globus et Locus
Making Ground Book summary
Adrian Vickery Hill, researcher Osmosnetwork Valeria Fedeli, professor Politecnica di Milano
Impacts of the health crisis on the accessibility of services of general interest
Mar Ortega-Reig, Universitat Politècnica de València, Carsten Schürmann, TCP International, Adrian Ferrandis, Universitat de València
6AIKA: when cities pool resources together to develop solutions for common challenges
Ana Robalo Correia, Senior consultant , Deloitte Margarida Campolargo, Community and Project Manager, OASC Martin Brynskov, Chair, OASC
Outlook of the Czech Presidency
Milada Hronkova, Department of European Territorial Cooperation, Ministry for Regional Development, Czech Republic
Looking for back issues?
Browse the Archive >

Previous Article Next Article
Stronger together
Page 22