COPIED
5 mins

The implications of land take, urban sprawl and soil sealing for people, businesses and the environment

In the pursuit of sustainable development, the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) has been a leading voice, addressing critical issues such as land use and its profound implications for people, businesses and the environment. This article revolves around the implementation of the no net land take policies, a pivotal strategy aiming to reconcile economic progress with environmental preservation.

Within this broader context, the EESC has raised significant concerns regarding the potential threat posed by land grabbing, fuelled by various EU policy areas, including policies on the bioeconomy, trade and agriculture. The acquisition of agricultural land by external investors and entities raises alarms about its adverse impact on family farms. In response, the EESC advocates for protective measures to ensure the sustainability of family farming, which is a viable alternative to the challenges posed by industrialised agriculture.

Taking into account the multilateral values of soil, the protection of soil is important for maintaining the identity, culture and heritage of rural areas. Not only is soil used in different production processes, but it is the link between generations, current and future ones, and this should remain unchanged.

Addressing issues related to responsible land governance, the EESC has been actively urging Member States to implement the voluntary guidelines on responsible governance on tenure, which seeks to establish a robust framework that safeguards against unfair practices and promotes responsible land tenure.

The EESC has also called upon the European Parliament and the Council to deliberate on the free movement of capital concerning the alienation and acquisition of agricultural land and agribusinesses. This debate not only extends within the EU but also raises questions about how these movements might affect relationships with third countries. Striking a balance between economic interests and responsible land use becomes imperative in these discussions.

The free movement of capital contributes to land grabbing, driven by factors like globalization, population growth, and rising demand for resources. Large corporations, dominating the land market, distort its functioning, affecting prices and lease conditions. The swift movement of capital from one region or continent to another exacerbates over-exploitation and soil degradation, emphasizing the generational responsibility for soil protection within sustainable development principles.

In its opinion on the Soil Health Law, the EESC recognises the strategic importance of soil as an economic and environmental asset, recalling that healthy soils are a fundamental resource for food production. Advocating for a European legal framework, the committee aims to prevent soil degradation, support restoration programmes and establish a road map towards maintaining good soil health. This underlines the interconnectedness of environmental sustainability and economic prosperity.

The principle of transversal multilevel and multistakeholder approaches in the field of urban development can be easily transferred to soil management and governance, taking into account urban?rural complementarity.

Urbanisation processes, often resulting in land take, present a significant challenge. While the EESC supports the ambitious goal of achieving the no net land take objective by 2050, it also emphasises the importance of accompanying this goal with incentives that encourage the reuse of abandoned sites and the restoration of unused impermeable surfaces. This approach seeks to mitigate the impact of urbanisation on fertile soils, thus aligning with the broader objectives of responsible land management.

The EESC prioritises the importance of a circular and resource-efficient economy in safeguarding the ecological productivity of European soils. Initiatives for deforestation-free guarantees in international trade underline the need for responsible global engagement in land use practices.

Acknowledging the substantial land use of the livestock sector, the EESC calls for a European protein strategy that aligns with regional feed potential. The emphasis is on sustainability and responsible land management within the agricultural sector that also enhances biodiversity.

The free movement of capital contributes to land grabbing, driven by factors like globalization, population growth, and rising demand for resources. Large corporations, dominating the land market, distort its functioning, affecting prices and lease conditions.

At the same time, the EESC calls for the better support of the use of abandoned land and for the consideration of land that could be recovered through the reduction of food waste (20 % of the food produced in the EU is wasted ).

Moreover, in its recent own-initiative opinion on the role of young people in rural development, the EESC recognises that generational renewal in the agricultural sector and access to land are key components of fostering vibrant rural communities. As Europe strives for a more sustainable and inclusive future, the engagement of young people is increasingly pivotal, including on matters relating to land use planning and management.

In light of these considerations, the EESC emphasises the critical role of the common agricultural policy (CAP) in preserving access to and sustainable use of agricultural land across the EU. To address the decline in the number of farms and to promote generational renewal, the EESC calls for action to increase average earnings from farming and improve access to land. This includes measures such as investment grants, preferential credit, national legislation regarding land transfer, and favourable investment conditions under the second pillar, bringing additional private funding. In addition, the CAP must play a vital role in preventing land abandonment and promoting the sustainable exploitation of marginal land to ensure the overall attractiveness of rural areas.

In addition, in its opinion on soil health, the EESC highlights the need for a standardised list of examples of forms of land cover. This list would provide a common framework for all Member States to monitor land cover consistently, particularly in cases where doubts may arise regarding the classification of artificial land. This standardised approach aims to enhance transparency and facilitate effective decision-making regarding land use policies across the EU.

The principle of transversal multilevel and multistakeholder approaches in the field of urban development can be easily transferred to soil management and governance, taking into account urban-rural complementarity.

Soil is not an ordinary resource in the necessary mix of resources in development. Soil is a source of life, is critical for biodiversity and plays a critical role in the climate transition. The relation between soil and development is very sensitive and needs to be approached by taking into account future needs at the same time as protecting life. The handling of soil must take into account intersectoral and interinstitutional cooperation and integration at strategic and operational levels in order to ensure the just, green and productive usage of soil.

Nicoletta Merlo, EESC member and rapporteur of EESC Opinion: The role of youth in rural development; Stoyan Tchoukanov, EESC member and rapporteur of EESC Opinion: Promoting autonomous and sustainable food production strategies for the common agricultural policy post-2027; Florian Marin, EESC member and rapporteur of EESC Opinion: Thematic partnerships under the Ljubljana Agreement.

Liege, Belgium
//image from Shutterstock.com
This article appears in Take no land no more: soil matte

Go to Page View
This article appears in...
Take no land no more: soil matte
Go to Page View
EditoriALL
Wiktor Szydarowski, ESPON EGTC Director
How is Wallonia addressing the challenge of spatial optimisation?
Vice-President of Wallonia, Minister of Economy, Foreign Trade, Research and Innovation, Digital, Agriculture, Territorial Planning, IFAPME, and Competence Centres.
Boosting talent in the EU
Cristina Maestre Martin De Almagro, Member of the European Parliament
Land take in the EU Soil Policy
Mirco Barbero, Policy officer, Soil Protection and Sustainable Land Use DG Environment, European Commission
No net land take in simple words
Marjan van Herwijnen and Nikos Lampropoulos, ESPON EGTC
European soil health framework: why soil matters - the local and regional perspectives
Frida Nilsson, CoR rapporteur, member of Lidköping municipal council (Sweden)
The implications of land take, urban sprawl and soil sealing for people, businesses and the environment
Nicoletta Merlo, Stoyan Tchoukanov, Florian Marin, EESC members and rapporteurs
ESPON Week in Mons | 5 & 6 June
Seminar theme: No net land take - policies an practices in European regions
No land take in a cross-border metropolitan context: Province of Luxembourg and Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
Alexandre Petit, Head of territorial strategy department, IDELUX Group
Comparative analysis of the concepts of soil sealing and land take in major European cities
Antoine Decoville and Valérie Feltgen, geographers, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
Urbanisation strategies for transregional or transnational valleys facing climate change
Thomas Deridder, Director-General and Christian Bastin, Associate Researcher, Destrée Institute
No net land take policies, a recurring metropolitan affair?
Henk Bouwman, secretary general of METREX
Calling a halt to land take in Flanders
Margo Bienstman, Ann Pisman, Isabelle Loris and Stijn Vanderheiden, Department of Environment and Spatial Development Flanders
Built environment: Connecting the dots of circularity
Serena Lisai, Project Officer, Built Environment Thematic Lead, ACR+
Land Use Policies: Local Solutions for Global Challenges
Rudiger Ahrend, Andres Fuentes, Jaebeum Cho, Matteo Schleicher, OECD
A tool for improving land use: RUDIFUN
Arjan Harbers, Martijn Spoon and Hans van Amsterdam, PBL
Affordable and adequate housing - a common goal in the face of diverse contexts
Selim Banabak, University Assistant, Franziska Sielker, Professor of Urban and Regional Research, Institute of Spatial Planning, TU Wien
New calls for tenders
Strategic Autonomy Rules for Trade in European Regions
Flash back
ESPON seminar@Cuenca
Looking for back issues?
Browse the Archive >

Previous Article Next Article
Take no land no more: soil matte
CONTENTS
Page 18
PAGE VIEW